I finally just got through reading Time Magazine's cover story last week about today's teens. If you haven't read it yet, and do not subscribe to Time, you can sign up for a day pass. The in-depth piece offers all sorts of scenarios about today's multitasking young generation. There are social scientists who believe all of the media consumption from digital outlets at one time will ultimately have a negative effect on the generation as a whole. Here's the strongest quote from the piece: "Although such habits may prepare kids for today's frenzied workplace, many cognitive scientists are positively alarmed by the trend. Kids that are instant messaging while doing homework, playing games online and watching TV, I predict, aren't going to do well in the long run, says Jordan Grafman, chief of the cognitive neuroscience section at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Decades of research (not to mention common sense) indicate that the quality of one's output and depth of thought deteriorate as one attends to ever more tasks. Some are concerned about the disappearance of mental downtime to relax and reflect. Roberts notes Stanford students can't go the few minutes between their 10 o'clock and 11 o'clock classes without talking on their cell phones. It seems to me that there's almost a discomfort with not being stimulated--a kind of I can't stand the silence."
What does this all mean? In the long run many social scientists fear today's digital generation will grow up to be, for lack of a better word, numb within the world that surrounds them. The constant stimulation of IM, text messages and iPods may shower a layer of insensitivity and indifference on this generation when they hit 25 or 30. At the end of the day, Time needs to sell copies at the newsstand, so this all may be a little too extreme and dramatic, but nevertheless, it makes you think.