It didn't take a rocket scientist to see this coming. After a tumultuous couple of weeks since announcing what was heralded as a breakthrough in online and word of mouth advertising, social networking kingpin, Facebook, has announced changes to its Beacon advertising program. In case you're unfamiliar with Beacon, essentially, the system utilizes the platform to send a Facebook member's friends a message on what they are buying from a variety of partner sites ranging from Fandango, the movie ticketing site to the online discount retailer, Overstock. The controversy from the member base stemmed from confusion and difficulty with respect to opting out of the service. What has been documented so far includes member accounts of having their holiday purchases"broadcast" to the friend base unknowingly and then of course having the boyfriend and girlfriend find out about the surprise a few days or a few weeks too early (depending on your religious beliefs). A lot of people this morning are comparing the pullback and adjustments to Beacon to the challenges the Newsfeed application faced earlier this year, but I don't really see the similarity quite frankly. Luckily for us, we were in Chicago conducting client focus groups at the time Facebook announced the launch of Beacon so we were quickly able to get a sense of what the target audience thought of it. To keep it nice and p.c. on this beautiful fall Friday, let us just say we saw this coming. Here's the deal. A lot of supposed "experts" have been talking up the power of marketing on social networking sites. The problem comes up when these experts talk about the tactics of doing so. This is where Beacon ran into problems. First, the notion of "personifying" a brand or product in a social network like Facebook is...well bullshit. The audience, especially the college audience sees right through it and most likely with some disdain. Second, the whole notion of "friending" a brand or product works only when the brand or product is contextually relevant, key word really being contextually. We have to throw out the bullshit flag again when we read or hear folks talking about how much the youth audience loves to enter into conversations with brands and products. The statement is made far too often and is only remotely accurate for a very, very small percentage of the overall audience. If brands and products want this two-way conversation to begin, typically, the best chances of success start with a contest/sweepstakes (it's fair to say that almost all members of the audience love to win or at least have a chance to win free stuff), doing a live event (teens and college students respond and respect the fact that brands and companies visit them live, in-person on campus or at school), or create a tool or service that is deemed relevant or thoughtful and will add some sort of immediate value to members of the audience. After one of more of these "intro" tactics are executed (successfully, of course) then you can go into the other stuff. I apologize, I know I got a little off topic from the start of the post, but I believe it's imperative for all readers to know and understand the realities of the current social network marketing space, because there is way too many people out there saying just flat out incorrect things with respect to best practices for marketing. Ok, rant done, have a great weekend.